Figure 4.5 shows the mass-to-flux ratio
normalized with the critical value
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75da7/75da75a8a79b3208be5f5e1443ebd822bb5d6c1c" alt="\begin{displaymath}
\lambda_C\equiv \frac{\left(\frac{M}{\Phi}\right)_{\rm obs}}{\left(\frac{M}{\Phi}\right)_{\rm crit}}
\end{displaymath}" |
(4.43) |
where
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1155a/1155a766dcc378a41346053eaf555ee85c28efcc" alt="\begin{displaymath}
\left(\frac{M}{\Phi}\right)_{\rm crit}=\frac{1}{2\pi G^{1/2}}
\end{displaymath}" |
(4.44) |
is the critical mass-to-flux ratio which is
obtained numerically from equation (4.31).
represents a supercritical cloud while
represents a subcritical cloud.
Figure 4.5:
Mass-to-flux ratio is plotted against the column density.
Dots are obtained from Zeeman splitting and stars are
Chandrasekhar-Fermi method.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/086db/086dbdd4e54ac3ffc00f5d051392225e3128b28f" alt="\begin{figure}\centering\leavevmode
\epsfxsize =0.7\columnwidth \epsfbox{eps/crutcher04-4.ps}\end{figure}" |
Figure 4.5 indicates
cloud cores are more or less found near the critical mass-to-flux ratio.
They are not distributed either
in the regions
(very supercritical)
or
(very subcritical).
Kohji Tomisaka
2009-12-10