¥È¥Ã¥×   ¿·µ¬ °ìÍ÷ ñ¸ì¸¡º÷ ºÇ½ª¹¹¿·   ¥Ø¥ë¥×   ºÇ½ª¹¹¿·¤ÎRSS

Planet ¤Î¥Ð¥Ã¥¯¥¢¥Ã¥×¤Î¸½ºß¤È¤Îº¹Ê¬(No.52)


  • Äɲ䵤줿¹Ô¤Ï¤³¤Î¿§¤Ç¤¹¡£
  • ºï½ü¤µ¤ì¤¿¹Ô¤Ï¤³¤Î¿§¤Ç¤¹¡£
#norelated
* ÏÇÀ±¥»¥ß¥Ê¡¼2018 [#zbb5ecca]
* ÏÇÀ±¥»¥ß¥Ê¡¼2020 [#zbb5ecca]

ÏÇÀ±¥»¥ß¥Ê¡¼¤Ï¸¶Â§¤È¤·¤ÆËè½µÌÚÍËÆü¤Î14:00¤«¤éÍýÏÀÉô¥»¥ß¥Ê¡¼¼¼¤Ç³«ºÅ¤·¤Æ¤¤¤Þ¤¹¡£~
astro-ph¥»¥ß¥Ê¡¼¤ÏËè½µ¶âÍËÆü¤Î12:30¤«¤éÍýÏÀÉô¥»¥ß¥Ê¡¼¼¼¤Ç³«ºÅ¤·¤Æ¤¤¤Þ¤¹¡£
ÏÇÀ±¥»¥ß¥Ê¡¼¤Ï¸¶Â§¤È¤·¤ÆËè½µÌÚÍËÆü¤Î14:00¤«¤é³«ºÅ¤·¤Æ¤¤¤Þ¤¹¡£¡ÊÏ¢Íí·¸¡§À±Ìî ÍÚ, ¹ÓÀî ÁÏÂÀ, ¸Å²È ·ò¼¡, ²®¸¶ ÀµÇî¡Ë~
astro-ph¥»¥ß¥Ê¡¼¤ÏËè½µ¶âÍËÆü¤Î12:00¤«¤é³«ºÅ¤·¤Æ¤¤¤Þ¤¹¡£¡ÊÏ¢Íí·¸¡§Carol Kwok¡Ë

// ¥»¥ß¥Ê¡¼È¯É½½çÈÖ
// 

** Schedule & History [#vfafd1d8]

[[2019ǯÅÙ>Planet2019]]
[[2018ǯÅÙ>Planet2018]]
[[2017ǯÅÙ>Planet2017]]
[[2016ǯÅÙ>Planet2016]]
[[2015ǯÅÙ>Planet2015]]
[[2014ǯÅÙ>Planet2014]]

|BGCOLOR(#ccf):|BGCOLOR(#ffc):|BGCOLOR(#ffc):|BGCOLOR(#fcf):|c
|ÆüÄø|ȯɽ|¥¿¥¤¥È¥ë|Remarks|h
|BGCOLOR(#ccf):|BGCOLOR(#ffc):|BGCOLOR(#ffc):|BGCOLOR(#fcf):|c
//|BGCOLOR(#ddf):|BGCOLOR(#ffd):|BGCOLOR(#ffd):|c
|[[Á°´ü Âè1²ó 5/17 15:00->#planet0517]]|²®¸¶ ÀµÇî| Formation of the terrestrial planets in the solar system around 1 au via radial concentration of planetesimals|15:00|
|[[Á°´ü Âè2²ó 5/24 15:00->#planet0524]]|ÇÈ¡¹ÇìÉô ¹­Î´ | Determination of outer edge of circumplanetary disk in local 3d hydrodynamic simulations |15:00|
|[[Á°´ü Âè3²ó 5/30 14:00->#planet0530]]|Dimitri Veras | The growing field of post-main-sequence exoplanetary science, with strong connections to the solar system|Wednesday@Rinko room|
|[[Á°´ü Âè4²ó 6/14 14:00->#planet0614]]|ºÙÌî ¼··î | Numerical simulations of the giant impact onto the magma ocean||
|[[Á°´ü Âè5²ó 6/28 14:00->#planet0628]]|ʼƬ ζ¼ù | On the origin of Phobos and Deimos||
|[[Á°´ü Âè6²ó 7/12 14:00->#planet0712]]|Èõ¸ý Í­Íý²Ä | Inner solar system objects with hyperbolic orbits: Interstellar origin or Oort cloud comets?||
|[[Á°´ü Âè7²ó 7/19 14:00->#planet0719]]|ÃæÌî ζǷ²ð | Ãæ¿´À±¼ÁÎ̤ˤè¤ë¸¶»ÏÏÇÀ±·Ï±ßÈ׿ʲ½¤ÎÊѲ½||
|[[Á°´ü Âè8²ó 7/26 14:00->#planet0726]]|ÃæÅè ºÌǵ | Orbital evolution of Saturn's mid-sized moons and the tidal heating of Enceladus||
|[[¸å´ü Âè1²ó 9/19 14:00->#planet0919]]|ÇÈ¡¹ÇìÉô ¹­Î´ | ÏÀʸ¾Ò²ð (Tanigawa et al. 2012, ApJ, Distribution of Accreting Gas and Angular Momentum onto Circumplanetary Disks)||
|[[¸å´ü Âè2²ó 10/3 14:00->#planet1003]]|¾®µ×ÊÝ ±Ñ°ìϺ | Planetesimal Formation by Gravitational Instability of a Porous Dust Disk||
|[[¸å´ü Âè3²ó 10/24 14:00->#planet1024]]|Âí ůϯ | Chondrule Survivability in the Protosolar disk ||
|[[¸å´ü Âè4²ó 10/31 13:00->#planet1031]]|Jason Man Yin Woo | The curious case of Mars' formation |13:00|
|[[¸å´ü Âè5²ó 11/7 14:00->#planet1107]]|¾¾ËÜÐһΠ|The formation and dynamical evolution of super-Earths through in-situ giant impacts around M dwarfs ||
|[[¸å´ü Âè6²ó 11/14 15:00->#planet1114]]|Adrien Leleu |Stability and detectability of co-orbital exoplanets |15:00- ±¡À¸¥»¥ß¥Ê¡¼¼¼|
|[[¸å´ü Âè7²ó 11/21 13:00->#planet1121]]|Æ£°æÍªÎ¤ |On the radiation hydrodynamic simulations of formation of circumplanetary disks ||
|[[¸å´ü Âè8²ó 11/29 14:00->#planet1129]]|ĹëÀɧ |Reconsideration of Formation Process of Rocky Planetesimals |Thursday|
|[[¸å´ü Âè9²ó 12/19 14:00->#planet1219]]|¼ÆÅÄæÆ |Metallicity Enhancement of Gas Giants by Late Accretion of Solids - the Effect of Orbital Evolution ||
|[[¸å´ü Âè10²ó 1/9 10:00->#planet0109]]|¾®ÎÓ¹À |N body simulation with collisional fragmentation for planet formation in giant impact stages ||
//|[[¸å´ü Âè11²ó 1/23 14:00->#planet0123]]|ÀîÅçͳ°Í |Theoretical transmission spectra of exoplanet atmospheres with hydrocarbon haze: Exploration of metallicity-dependence and application to extremely low-density planet Kepler-51b ||
|BGCOLOR(#ccf):|BGCOLOR(#ffc):|BGCOLOR(#ffc):|BGCOLOR(#fcf):|BGCOLOR(#cff):|c
|ÆüÄø|ȯɽ|¥¿¥¤¥È¥ë|Remarks|ôÅö|h
|BGCOLOR(#ccf):|BGCOLOR(#ffc):|BGCOLOR(#ffc):|BGCOLOR(#fcf):|BGCOLOR(#cff):|c
//|BGCOLOR(#ddf):|BGCOLOR(#ffd):|BGCOLOR(#ffd):|BGCOLOR(#cff):|c
|[[Á°´ü Âè1²ó 4/9 15:00->#planet0409]]|All members| Self-introduction |15:00|²®¸¶|
|[[Á°´ü Âè2²ó 4/16 14:00->#planet0409]]|Haruka Hoshino, Hirotaka Hohokabe| Small ASJ meeting ||¹ÓÀî|
|[[Á°´ü Âè3²ó 4/23 14:00->#planet0409]]|Yuki Yoshida, Eiichiro Kokubo| Small ASJ meeting ||À±Ìî|
|[[Á°´ü Âè4²ó 5/14 14:00->#planet0409]]|Sota Arakawa| Thermal history and tidal evolution of trans-Neptunian satellite systems ||¸Å²È|
|[[Á°´ü Âè5²ó 5/28 14:00->#planet0528]]|Takuya Takarada (ABC)| Radial-velocity search and statistical studies for short-period planets in the Pleiades open cluster ||¹ÓÀî|
|[[Á°´ü Âè6²ó 6/4 16:00->#planet0606]]|Beibei Liu (Lund Univ)| Pebble-driven planet formation around very low-mass stars and brown dwarfs |16:00|²®¸¶|
|[[Á°´ü Âè7²ó 7/9 14:00->#planet0606]]|Yuka Fujii|Detecting molecular lines of warm/temperate exoplanets with mid-infrared high-resolution spectroscopy||À±Ìî|
|[[Á°´ü Âè8²ó 7/21 14:00->#planet0606]]|Masato Ishizuka (U. Tokyo)|Studies of exoplanets with high resolution spectroscopy||¸Å²È|
|[[¸å´ü Âè1²ó 10/16 14:00->#planet1016]]|Makiko Ban|Free-floating planet research and perspective||²®¸¶|
|[[¸å´ü Âè2²ó 10/30 14:30->#planet1030]]|Yuki Tanaka (Tohoku Univ.)|Gap formation by a super-Jupiter-mass planet and its effects on the planetary mass accretion rate|14:30|²®¸¶|
|[[¸å´ü Âè3²ó 11/20 14:00->#planet1031]]|Shota Notsu (RIKEN)| The composition of hot Jupiter atmospheres assembled within chemically evolved protoplanetary discs||¸Å²È|
|[[¸å´ü Âè4²ó 11/27 14:00->#planet1127]]|Kazuaki A. Homma (Tokyo Tech)| Vertical growth of dust particles with UV-irradiation and organic-synthesis in protoplanetary disks||¹ÓÀî|
|[[¸å´ü Âè5²ó 12/17 15:00->#planet1127]]|Naho Fujita (Kyoto Univ.)| û¼þ´üsuper-Earth¤ÎÂ絤»¶°ï¤Ëȼ¤¦µ°Æ»¿Ê²½|Thu. 15:00|À±Ìî|
|[[¸å´ü Âè6²ó 1/12 14:00->#planet0112]]| Jerome de Leon (Univ. Tokyo)| Discovery and validation of transiting exoplanets with diverse radii and ages|Tuesday|²®¸¶|
|[[¸å´ü Âè7²ó 1/22 14:00->#planet0122]]|Yuki Yoshida¡¡|¡Ê½¤ÏÀȯɽÎý½¬¡Ë|¶âÍËÆü 14:00|¹ÓÀî|
|[[¸å´ü Âè8²ó 2/26 14:00->#planet0226]]|Haruka Sakuraba (Tokyo Tech)| TBA||²®¸¶|

//º£¸å¤Î¸õÊä
//ÆâÉô¡§¾®µ×ÊÝ¡¢²¡Ìî¡¢²®¸¶¡¢ÇÈ¡¹ÇìÉô¡¢Carol¡¢À±Ìî
//¸¶À¤ó¡¢¿¹Å礵¤ó¡¢¿¹¤µ¤ó¡ÊÅ칩Âç¡Ë¡¢¼ÇÃÓ¤µ¤ó¡ÊÅ칩Âç¡Ë
//¾®ÎÓ¤µ¤ó¡Ê̾Âç¡Ë¡¢º´¡¹ÌÚ¤µ¤ó¡ÊµþÂç¡Ë¢«ÍýÏÀ¥³¥í¥­¥¦¥à¡©
//¹â¶¶¼ÂÆ»¤µ¤ó¡¤Ä¹Ã«Àɧ¤µ¤ó
//¾®µ×Êݤµ¤ó¡§Ishigaki¤µ¤ó(ISAS)
//²®¸¶¡§¶ðÌÚ¤µ¤ó(ÅìÂç), Sakuraba¤µ¤ó(Å칩Âç), Liu(Lund)
//¹ÓÀî¡§ËÜ´ÖÏÂÌÀ¤µ¤ó (D1), ĹëÀɧ¤µ¤ó (ÅìÂç¶ð¾ì)
//¸Å²È¡§Gianni Cataldi(ÅìÂçŷʸ)¡¤ÌîÄÅæÆÂÀ¤µ¤ó(Íý¸¦) 
//ÀÐß·¤µ¤ó(µþÂç)
//¿¹Å礵¤ó

// ¢«¥À¥Ö¥ë¥¹¥é¥Ã¥·¥å¤Ï¥³¥á¥ó¥È¥¢¥¦¥È
:&aname(planet0530){5/30}; Dimitri Veras, The growing field of post-main-sequence exoplanetary science, with strong connections to the solar system|
The quest for identifying the bulk chemical composition of extrasolar
planets and robust observational evidence that between 25% and 50% of
all Milky Way white dwarfs host currently dynamically-active planetary
systems motivate investigations that link their formation and fate.
Here I provide a review of our current knowledge of these systems,
including an update on the observational and theoretical aspects of
the groundbreaking discovery of at least one disintegrating minor
planet transiting white dwarf WD 1145+017. I show how this field
incorporates several facets of solar system physics and chemistry, and
how its interdisciplinary nature requires input from orbital dynamics,
stellar evolution, astrochemistry, atmospheric science and surface
processes.


//:&aname(planet1107){5/21}; ̾Á°¡¡¥¿¥¤¥È¥ë|
//¥¢¥Ö¥¹¥È
:&aname(planet1031){10/31}; Jason Woo, The curious case of Mars' formation|
Dynamical models of planet formation coupled with cosmochemical data from martian meteorites show that Mars'
isotopic composition is distinct from that of Earth. Reconciliation of formation models with meteorite data require that
Mars grew further from the Sun than its present position. Here, we evaluate this compositional difference in more detail
by comparing output from two N-body planet formation models. The first of these planet formation models simulates
what is termed the `Classical' case wherein Jupiter and Saturn are kept in their current orbits. We compare these
results with another model based on the `Grand Tack', in which Jupiter and Saturn migrate through the primordial
asteroid belt. Our estimate of the average fraction of chondrite assembled into Earth and Mars assumes that the initial
solid disk consists of only sources of enstatite chondrite composition in the inner region, and ordinary chondrite in the
outer region. Results of these analyses show that both models tend to yield Earth and Mars analogues whose accretion
zones overlap. The Classical case fares better in forming Mars with its documented composition (29% to 68% enstatite
chondrite plus 32% to 67% ordinary chondrite) though the Mars analogues are generally too massive. We also further
calculate the isotopic composition of 17O, 50Ti, 54Cr, 142Nd, 64Ni, and 92Mo in the martian mantle from the Grand
Tack simulations. We find that it is possible to match the calculated isotopic composition of all the above elements in
Mars' mantle with their measured values, but the resulting uncertainties are too large to place good restriction on the
early dynamical evolution and birth place of Mars.
:&aname(planet1107){11/7}; Yuji Matsumoto¡¡The formation and dynamical evolution of super-Earths through in-situ giant impacts around M dwarfs|
Recently, Earth-sized exoplanets are observed around TRAPPIST-1, which is M8 dwarf and has ~0.08 solar mass. Several on-going missions are targeting planets around M dwarfs. It is expected that more and more such planetary system around M dwarfs would be observed. There are some theoretical studies considering planetary formation around M dwarfs. However, the formation and dynamical evolution of close-in super-Earths have not understood systematically yet. We investigate the formation of close-in super-Earths through N-body simulations around M¡¡dwarfs. We use the same disk model with changing the stellar mass. At first, the dynamical evolution of isolation mass protoplanets is studied. As Matsumoto & Kokubo (2017) reported, protoplanets collide with their neighboring protoplanets soon after the orbital crossing around 1 solar mass star. Around M dwarfs, dynamical scattering between protoplanets becomes violent and such tournament-like collisional evolution is not seen. We also perform calculations with the systems that initially have protoplanets and planetesimals around M dwarfs. We find that planetesimals are ejected during some close scattering by protoplanets. The growth of protoplanets would be suppressed due to the ejection of planetesimals.
:&aname(planet1114){11/14}; Adrien Leleu/ Stability and detectability of co-orbital exoplanets|
Despite the existence of co-orbital bodies in the solar system (1:1 Mean-motion resonance), and the prediction of the formation of co-orbital planets by planetary system formation models, no co-orbital exoplanets (also called trojans) have been detected thus far. It can be due to the rarity of the configuration, the degeneracy of the co-orbital signature with other configurations, or the observational biases. After a description of various stable co-orbital configurations for a pair of planet, I will discuss the stability of the lagrangian equilibria (L4 and L5) during the migration in the protoplanetary disc for the variables associated to the resonant angle, but also in the direction of the eccentricities and inclination. Finally I will discuss the signature of co-orbitals exoplanets in Transit Timing Variation, transits, and combination of transit and radial velocity measurements.

:&aname(planet1219){12/19}; Sho Shibata/ Metallicity Enhancement of Gas Giants by Late Accretion of Solids - the Effect of Orbital Evolution|
Recent studies of internal structure of gas giants suggest that their envelope is enriched with heavier elements than hydrogen and helium, relative to their central star composition. It is considered that these enrichment in heavy elements are caused by the capture of planetesimals during the late formation stage of gas giants. Zhou & Lin 2007 and Shiraishi & Ida 2008 performed orbital integrations of planetesimals around a growing protoplanet in a constant protoplanetary disk, and estimated the total captured mass of planetesimals for Jupiter and Saturn.  However, they assumed a simple formation models and neglected some physically important effects.
In this study, we investigated the effect of a planet migration on the capture of planetesimals, in a single-planetary system and a multi-planetary system, respectively. We find that planetesimals swept by a migrating planet are trapped at the mean-motion resonances (MMRs), which works as a barrier and prevents planetesimals from approaching the planet. Thus, planetary migration itself has little contribution to increasing the amount of captured planetesimals. However, in a multi-planetary system, we find an interesting process that breaks the resonance trap and increases the amount of planetesimals captured by the planets. This effect is important to consider the capture of planetesimals in a multi-planetary system.
//:&aname(planet0418){4/18}; Carina Heinreichsberger, Terrestrial or Gaseous? A classification of exoplanets according to density, mass and radius|
//When looking at Exoplanet Archives the class of a planet is not given. Therefore I tried to find an easy and fast way to classify exoplanets using only density, mass and radius. In this talk I will discuss the formation theory of Planets to explain the boundaries between the different classes (gas, terrestrial) and show the results of my empirical study.

//:&aname(planet0123){1/23}; Yui Kawashima/¡¡Theoretical transmission spectra of //exoplanet atmospheres with hydrocarbon haze: Exploration of metallicity-dependence and application to extremely low-density planet Kepler-51b|
//Recently, properties of exoplanet atmospheres have been constrained via multi-wavelength transit observation, which measures an apparent decrease in stellar brightness during planetary transit in front of its host star (called transit depth). Sets of transit depths so far measured at different wavelengths (called transmission spectra) for some exoplanets are featureless or flat, inferring the existence of haze particles in the atmospheres. Previous studies that addressed theoretical modeling of transmission spectra of hydrogen-dominated atmospheres with haze used some assumed distribution and size of haze particles. In Kawashima & Ikoma (2018), we developed new photochemical and microphysical models of the creation, growth, and settling of haze particles for deriving their size and number-density distributions in hydrogen-dominated atmospheres of close-in warm (< 1000 K) exoplanets. In this talk, using our developed models, we explore the metallicity-dependence of the production rate of haze and the resultant transmission spectra, and discuss implications for observations. Also, we apply our models to recently-observed extremely low-density planet Kepler-51b. We have found that for an extremely low-gravity planet such as Kepler-51b, haze particles grow significantly large in the upper atmosphere due to the small sedimentation velocity, resulting in the featureless or flat transmission spectrum in a wide wavelength range as observationally detected.
:&aname(planet0604){6/4}; Beibei Liu, Pebble-driven planet formation around very low-mass stars and brown dwarfs|
We conduct a pebble-driven planet population synthesis study to investigate the formation of planets around very low-mass stars and brown dwarfs, in the (sub)stellar mass range between 0.01 M&#8857; and 0.1 M&#8857;. Based on the extrapolation of numerical simulations of planetesimal formation by the streaming instability, we obtain the characteristic mass of the planetesimals and the initial masses of the protoplanets (largest bodies from the planetesimal size distributions), in either the early self-gravitating phase or the later non-self-gravitating phase of the protoplanetary disk evolution. We find that the initial protoplanets form with masses that increase with host mass, orbital distance and decrease with disk age. Around late M-dwarfs of 0.1 M&#8857;, these protoplanets can grow up to Earth-mass planets by pebble accretion. However, around brown dwarfs of 0.01 M&#8857;, planets do not grow larger than Mars mass when the initial protoplanets are born early in self-gravitating disks, and their growth stalls at around 0.01 Earth-mass when they are born late in non-self-gravitating disks. Around these low mass stars and brown dwarfs, we find no channel for gas giant planet formation because the solid cores remain too small. When the initial protoplanets form only at the water-ice line, the final planets typically have &#8819;15% water mass fraction. Alternatively, when the initial protoplanets form log-uniformly distributed over the entire protoplanetary disk, the final planets are either very water-rich (water mass fraction &#8819;15%) or entirely rocky (water mass fraction &#8818;5%).

//:&aname(planet1107){5/21}; ̾Á°¡¡¥¿¥¤¥È¥ë|
//¥¢¥Ö¥¹¥È
:&aname(planet1016){10/16}; Makiko Ban, Free-floating planet research and perspective|
The free-floating planet (FFP) is a unique type of exoplanet. There have been very scarce discoveries about it because of the difficulty of observation. The up-comming space-based telescope missions (Euclid and Roman) are expected to boost the FFP research. Here, I'd like to introduce FFPs, the challenges about the research we are facing, and future perspectives that will be offered by those up-comming missions through my latest paper.

:&aname(planet1030){10/30}; Yuki Tanaka, Gap formation by a super-Jupiter-mass planet and its effects on the planetary mass accretion rate|
A giant planet embedded in a protoplanetary disk creates a gap structure along with its orbit by disk-planet interaction. Physical properties of the gap depend on several conditions such as mass of the planet and disk structures, and they affect both mass accretion rate onto the planet via the gap and migration rate of the planet. Therefore, the properties of the gap are important to investigate formation and evolution of planetary systems.
Recently, numerical simulations of the disk-planet interaction have been done intensively, and the disk properties such as width and depth of the gap, and mass accretion rate have been studied. However, previous studies mainly focused on planets less massive than Jupiter. In addition, there are a discrepancy between several previous works on the mass accretion rate onto the planet heavier than Jupiter. Since a lot of super-Jupiter-mass planets have been found, formation and evolution of them in the protoplanetary disk should be investigated in more detail.
We performed a set of hydrodynamic simulation of disk-planet interaction and investigated the properties of the gap and their parameter dependence. We varied the planetary mass from 1 to 10 Jupiter masses. We found that the gap becomes deeper as planet's mass increases up to around 3 Jupiter masses, but in more massive cases the outer edge of the gap shows significant eccentricity, which is consistent with several previous works. In this eccentric regime, the gap depth becomes shallower than an empirical relation between the depth and the planetary mass due to non-steady behavior of the gap outer edge. We also estimated the mass accretion rate onto the planet by using our result and found that the accretion rate can increase when the planet's mass is heavier because of the eccentricity of the gap.

:&aname(planet1031){11/20}; Shota Notsu, The composition of hot Jupiter atmospheres assembled within chemically evolved protoplanetary discs|
The radial-dependent positions of snowlines of abundant oxygen- and 
carbon-bearing molecules in protoplanetary discs will result in systematic
radial variations in the C/O ratios in the gas and ice. 
This variation is proposed as a tracer of the formation location of gas-giant planets. 
However, disc chemistry can affect the C/O ratios in the gas and ice, thus potentially
erasing the chemical fingerprint of snowlines in gas-giant atmospheres.
We calculate the molecular composition of hot Jupiter atmospheres using elemental
abundances extracted from a chemical kinetics model of a disc midplane where we 
have varied the initial abundances and ionization rates. The models predict a
wider diversity of possible atmospheres than those predicted using elemental
ratios from snowlines only. As found in previous work, as the C/O ratio exceeds
the solar value, the mixing ratio of CH4 increases in the lower
atmosphere, and those of C2H2 and HCN increase mainly in the upper
atmosphere. The mixing ratio of H2O correspondingly decreases. We find
that hot Jupiters with C/O>1 can only form between the CO2 and CH4
snowlines. Moreover, they can only form in a disc which has fully inherited
interstellar abundances, and where negligible chemistry has occurred. Hence,
carbon-rich planets are likely rare, unless efficient transport of
hydrocarbon-rich ices via pebble drift to within the CH4 snowline is a
common phenomenon. We predict combinations of C/O ratios and elemental
abundances that can constrain gas-giant planet formation locations relative to
snowline positions, and that can provide insight into the disc chemical
history. 
This seminar talk is mainly based on our paper which was recently published, Notsu et al. (2020, MNRAS, 499, 2229).
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa2944

:&aname(planet1127){11/27}; Kazuaki A. Homma, Vertical growth of dust particles with UV-irradiation and organic-synthesis in protoplanetary disks|
Refractory organic matter found in the solar-system would play important roles in life and planet formation. It is important to reveal how the organic-matter was formed. One possible scenario is that they form by UV irradiation and subsequent heating of volatile ices on the dust particles in protoplanetary disks (Ciesla & Sandford (2012)). Ciesla & Sandford (2012) simulated the motion of dust particles in the protoplanetary disk and calculated the total UV-photon dosage on dust particles. They also estimated how much amount of the organic-matter would be formed from the total UV-photon dosage. They found that &#181;m-sized dust particles can absorb UV-irradiation efficiently and would contain 10 wt% of the organic matter. However, their model assumes the UV-irradiation strength without calculating the dust distribution. It is unclear whether large dust aggregates can absorb UV-radiation or not.
We study how much organic-matter can be formed on dust particles in protoplanetary disks via UV-irradiation on dust aggregates if we consider the dust size distribution. We construct a model to simulate growth, vertical transport, and UV absorption of icy aggregates in a protoplanetary disk. We find that the large dust aggregates can contain the irradiated-dust particles, due to the fragmentation of dust aggregates and the turbulent transportation of dust particles. We also estimate the amount of organic-matter formed on the dust particles by the UV-irradiation dosage. Our results suggest that the non-sticky dust particle in strong turbulent disks can contain the same amount of organic-matter as interplanetary dust particles.

:&aname(planet1107){12/17}; Æ£ÅĺÚÊæ¡¡Ã»¼þ´üsuper-Earth¤ÎÂ絤»¶°ï¤Ëȼ¤¦µ°Æ»¿Ê²½|
¶áǯKepler±§Ãè˾±ó¶À¤Ê¤É¤Î³èÌö¤Ë¤è¤Ã¤Æ·Ï³°ÏÇÀ±Ãµºº¤¬Â礭¤¯¿ÊŸ¤·¡¢ÆÃ¤Ësuper-Earth¤Îȯ¸«¿ô¤ÏÈôÌöŪ¤ËÁý²Ã¤·¤Æ¤¤¤ë¡£È¯¸«¤µ¤ì¤¿super-Earth¤Ï¤½¤ÎÂ絤Î̤䵰ƻʬÉۤˤª¤¤¤ÆÂ¿ÍÍÀ­¤ËÉÙ¤ó¤Ç¤¤¤ë¤¬¡¢¤³¤Î¿ÍÍÀ­¤Îµ¯¸»¤ÏÌÀ¤é¤«¤Ë¤Ê¤Ã¤Æ¤¤¤Ê¤¤¡£¤¿¤À¤·¡¢ÆÃ¤ËÃæ¿´À±¶á˵¤ò²ó¤ëû¼þ´üsuper-Earth¤Ç¤Ï¡¢·ÁÀ®Ä¾¸å¤ÎÂ絤¾õÂ֤䵰ƻ¤ò¸½ºß¤â°Ý»ý¤·¤Æ¤¤¤ë¤È¤Ï¹Í¤¨¤Ë¤¯¤¤¡£Ã»¼þ´üsuper-Earth¤Ï¡¢Ãæ¿´À±¤«¤é¤Î¶¯ÎϤÊXÀþ¡¢EUV¾È¼Í¤Ë¤è¤ëÂ絤¤ÎήÂÎÎϳØÅª»¶°ï¤ò·Ð¸³¤·¤Æ¸½ºß¤ÎÂ絤Î̤ˤʤäƤ¤¤ë¤Ï¤º¤Ç¤¢¤ë¡£¤³¤Î¤è¤¦¤ÊÏÇÀ±¤ÎÂ絤»¶°ï¤Ë¤Ä¤¤¤Æ¤Ï¤³¤ì¤Þ¤Ç¿¤¯¤Î¸¦µæ¤¬¤Ê¤µ¤ì¤Æ¤¤¤ë¤¬¡¢¤½¤ÎºÝ¡¢Â絤»¶°ï¤ò·Ð¸³¤¹¤ëÏÇÀ±¤Îµ°Æ»¤ÏÊѲ½¤·¤Ê¤¤¤È²¾Äꤵ¤ì¤Æ¤­¤¿¡£¤·¤«¤·¡¢Ãæ¿´À±-ÏÇÀ±·ÏÁ´ÂΤε°Æ»³Ñ±¿Æ°ÎÌÊݸ¤ò¹Íθ¤¹¤ë¤È¡¢¼ÂºÝ¤Ë¤ÏÂ絤»¶°ï¤Î¤ß¤Ç¤Ï¤Ê¤¯¡¢Â絤»¶°ï¤Ë¤è¤ë¼ÁÎÌ»¼º¤Ëȼ¤Ã¤ÆÏÇÀ±¤¬³°Â¦¤Ë°Üư¤¹¤ë¤È¤¤¤¦µ°Æ»¿Ê²½¤âµ¯¤­¤ë¤È¹Í¤¨¤é¤ì¤ë¡£Ëܸ¦µæ¤Ç¤Ïsuper-Earth·Ï¤Î¿ÍÍÀ­¤Îµ¯¸»¤òõ¤ë¤³¤È¤òÌÜŪ¤È¤·¡¢ÏÇÀ±¤ÎÂ絤»¶°ï¤Ëȼ¤¦µ°Æ»¿Ê²½¤¬ºÇ½ªÅª¤ÊÏÇÀ±·Ï¤Î¹½Â¤¤ËÍ¿¤¨¤ë±Æ¶Á¤òÄ´¤Ù¤¿¡£·×»»¤Î·ë²Ì¡¢ÏÇÀ±¤ÏÂ絤»¶°ï¤Ëȼ¤Ã¤Æ³°Â¦¤Ë°Üư¤¹¤ë¤³¤È¤¬Ê¬¤«¤ê¡¢¤³¤Î°Üư¤Ïµ°Æ»´Ö³Ö¤Î¶¹¤¤¥³¥ó¥Ñ¥¯¥È¤Êsuper-Earth·Ï¤Ç¤ÏÆÃ¤Ë½ÅÍפˤʤäƤ¯¤ë¤Ç¤¢¤í¤¦¤È¤¤¤¦¼¨º¶¤¬ÆÀ¤é¤ì¤¿¡£¤Þ¤¿º£¸å¤Ï´Ñ¬¤Ë¤è¤Ã¤ÆM·¿À±¼þ¤ê¤Îsuper-Earth¤¬Â¿¿ôȯ¸«¤µ¤ì¤ë¤³¤È¤¬´üÂÔ¤µ¤ì¤ë¤¿¤á¡¢Ëܸ¦µæ¤Ï¤½¤Î¤è¤¦¤Ê´Ñ¬¤ËÀè¶î¤±¤¿ÍýÏÀŪ¤Êͽ¬¤È¤Ê¤ë¡£¤µ¤é¤Ë¡¢¾­ÍèŪ¤Ë¤Ï´Ñ¬¥Ç¡¼¥¿¤È·×»»·ë²Ì¤òÈæ³Ó¤¹¤ë¤³¤È¤Ç¡¢¤³¤ÎÍýÏÀ¥â¥Ç¥ë¤òºÆ¸¡¾Ú¤¹¤ë¤³¤È¤¬²Äǽ¤Ë¤Ê¤ë¡£Ëֱܹé¤Ç¤Ï¤³¤Î¤è¤¦¤Êº£¸å¤Î·Ï³°ÏÇÀ±Ãµºº¤È¤Î´ØÏ¢¤Ë¤Ä¤¤¤Æ¤âµÄÏÀ¤·¤¿¤¤¡£

:&aname(planet0112){1/12}; Jerome de Leon, Discovery and validation of transiting exoplanets with diverse radii and ages|
The Kepler, K2, and TESS missions have brought many exciting exoplanet discoveries that yield new insights into the occurrence rate, formation and evolution of exoplanets. This success was driven primarily by the sustained efforts to homogeneously analyse ensembles of light curves to detect new candidate systems and consequently statistically validate or confirm their planetary nature aided by follow-up data. Here, "validation" is different from "confirmation," wherein the former means that there is overwhelming evidence that the transits must be explained by a planet, through elimination of all false positive scenarios, whereas the latter involves determination that the planet's mass is in the substellar regime (Mp<13Mjup). Confirmation via radial velocity (RV) mass measurements have been conducted for planets around bright stars but is impractical for faint or magnetically active stars, and is observationally expensive for the large numbers of planet candidates detected by Kepler and K2. In this talk, I will present the discovery and validation of 37 new transiting planets with various radii and ages using various statistical techniques. Then I will present some insights on the emerging trends observed from young transiting planet population and their implications on the planets¡Ç evolution during their first hundred million years.