Figure 4.5 shows the mass-to-flux ratio
normalized with the critical value
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8169f/8169f103c95c7791daf7d6d6b9acf3c759608cf5" alt="\begin{displaymath}
\lambda_C\equiv \frac{\left(\frac{M}{\Phi}\right)_{\rm obs}}{\left(\frac{M}{\Phi}\right)_{\rm crit}}
\end{displaymath}" |
(4.43) |
where
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/20c9c/20c9ce1a0800073a88d07183922317346df4852e" alt="\begin{displaymath}
\left(\frac{M}{\Phi}\right)_{\rm crit}=\frac{1}{2\pi G^{1/2}}
\end{displaymath}" |
(4.44) |
is the critical mass-to-flux ratio which is
obtained numerically from equation (4.31).
represents a supercritical cloud while
represents a subcritical cloud.
Figure 4.5:
Mass-to-flux ratio is plotted against the column density.
Dots are obtained from Zeeman splitting and stars are
Chandrasekhar-Fermi method.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d77fb/d77fb13edd1487873fb766da1c4b7dc6e91bcb45" alt="\begin{figure}\centering\leavevmode
\epsfxsize =0.7\columnwidth \epsfbox{eps/crutcher04-4.ps}\end{figure}" |
Figure 4.5 indicates
cloud cores are more or less found near the critical mass-to-flux ratio.
They are not distributed either
in the regions
(very supercritical)
or
(very subcritical).
Kohji Tomisaka
2012-10-03